Jo and Merin Adventures
Tuesday, October 15, 2024
Friday, October 11, 2024
Global Traffic Congestion Solution
Solving for Global Traffic Congestion
Traffic congestion in cities across the world is real in terms of economic and non-economic impacts. Economic impacts include productivity loss, fuel wastage costs, impact on businesses and logistics and a lot more. Non economic impact can be in the form of health impact or even at a ground level, lives lost because of ambulances not being able to reach hospitals on time.
Economic impact can be measured by doing a detailed estimate, making assumptions backed by data. For a major city, this is in the range of billions of dollars which several reports can corroborate. Non-economic impact in terms of lives lost can also be measured.
Hence, it is imperative for us to solve this problem.
This is a problem that affects me as well. So, just as a fun thought experiment , I decided to attempt solving this problem. And I believe I've cracked it. Below I'm sharing my case analysis. It's a 47 minute video. For a really hard problem like traffic congestion, unfortunately, I am not in a position to articulate my thoughts in a short 2 minute summarized version. Would love for you to go through the video when you have free time. It's just 3/4th of an hour - roughly about the time you might be waiting in traffic in total today or even a netflix episode.
Please watch and give feedback. If you like it, requesting you to please share this blog link (not just the youtube video) with your friends and family.
Imagine if is a realistic solution and it reaches the ears of your local municipality earlier- you could possibly use the time you save from traffic congestion to spend more time with your family, or you could meet friends and what not. So, if you like it, please do share :)
How do i need your help?
I need your help in analyzing whether this solution is practical. That is about just watching the video and letting me know feedback via Linkedin.
If you like the solution, do like, comment and share the blog link. Imagine you like the solution and share it with your network by strongly vouching for it and imagine they share it with their network again strongly vouching for the solutions suggested in the video, this logic will run on an infinite loop and the hope is that it will eventually reach traffic researchers who are looking at ways to reduce congestion or people in positions of authority take notice of that and then they're in a position to take action on the solution I've suggested.
As an individual, I have limitations. Best i can do is to stretch my mind to find the solution which i believe I've done. The implementation is a team effort. And for that I need your help.
Saturday, March 30, 2024
Gratitool
Gratitool
Consulting Beyond Business: Exploring Social Interactions
Consulting Beyond Business: Exploring Social Interactions
A common concern my friends/peers voiced was the inability to initiate a conversation with someone they found attractive in select social settings. I analyzed this as a fun consulting challenge and formulated a framework which helped some of my friends and tada! I turned out to be their "Pickup Consultant"(for a lack of a better word). Thought I'd just share this framework for the fun of it.
--------------------------------------
Imagine a girl (Let's call her X) and a guy (Y) sitting across a bar. Y finds X attractive and wants to go and talk to her and see where fate leads them. However, Y is facing a roadblock.
Lack of Adequate CONFIDENCE. That's the root cause problem.
We'll be going through a framework in an attempt to solve this fundamental problem. In a consultant's language. the problem statement for the client we're solving is :
"Increase the confidence levels of the insecure not-so-confident client Y above the threshold limit required to make a move on the target X"
Before we get into this framework, there are 2 assumptions and a story that are fundamental to this solution.
Assumptions
Assumption 1. Y has the minimum threshold confidence to talk to X. (Yes, I know, that's what we're trying to solve for, but stay with me for a bit - you'll see that we'll nullify this assumption as we go along)Assumption 2. Y will pursue X only if Y finds X interesting. With Assumption 1 in place, Y will drop pursuit of X at any point Y finds X not interesting enough.
Story
With both assumptions holding, This is a story which Y will be narrating to X. The story goes as below."Actually, I'm from the future. 50 years from now. In the future, I met with an wise wizard who granted me the wish to come back to any point time I wanted with all the learnings and knowledge I had till then. I asked my then life partner when and where I should come back to"
That's the story. I know it's quite abrupt/eccentric. But that's by design. Later you'll realize that you can plug in any better narrative you wish, but this story can do the job for the solution/framework, into which we'll dive in next.
The Solution | The Pickup Framework
Step 1. Y approaches X. Says "Hi. I noticed you from across the table. Can I get you a drink?" or "May I join you?" etc. There are 2 possible answers here.
Step 1.A X says "Yes".
Highly unlikely response but still possible. In this scenario, Y wins the game.
Step 1.B X says "No". This is the more likely and probable scenario. Go to Step 2.
Step 2. Y says "Well. That was the answer I expected. Before I leave, I'd like to tell you something very interesting. Can you spare just 2 mins of your time?". Now, let's look at the possibilities
Step 2.A X says "No. Not interested"
Remember our Assumption 2 ? Y should drop pursuit if he finds X un-interesting. In this case, as X cannot even spare 2 mins to listen to something interesting, Y can conclude that X is not interesting enough for him. Hence, he should drop pursuit and he is better off / WINS.
Step 2.B X says "Yes. I can give you 2 mins" Now Y has an opening. This is where the story we crafted comes. Y needs to deliver the story. And at the end of it it, Y says "You know what? When I was discussing with my then life partner what point in time should I come back to, she said come to the day we first met for the first time which is why I'm here talking to you. You wanted us to save the 6 months of the cat and mouse pursuit we went through before we got together. So, yeah. Would you let me get you that drink I offered?
There are multiple possibilities now. We explore them in Step 3.
Step 3A: X completely buys the story (probability is extremely low but possibility still exists :P which is a little concerning to be honest). She says "Yes" Y WINS
Step 3B: X feels it is indeed a very lame unrealistic story but an interesting way to make a pitch. She is interested and says "Yes". Again Y WINS
Step 3C: X feels it is a very lame story and a dumb way to make a pitch. She says "No". Before Y jumps into a conclusion on whether to pursue X further or not, Y needs to make one final attempt. So let's move onto Step 4
Step 4: Y tells X - "Ok. This was expected. I guess we'll just wait for time and destiny to naturally bring us together in 6 months. :) . I'd hate to come back again in another 50 years. You sure you don't want to grab a drink and save us both a great deal of time?"
Step 4A X says "ok. Sure. I'll let you buy me a drink". Y wins
Step 4B X says "Not interested" Coming back to our Assumption 2, now it's safe for Y to assume that if X cannot appreciate an interesting pitch, then he's better off not pursuing her further. So even in this case, Y wins!
An interesting observation you would have made is Y wins the game at every level of the process. The thought that whatever be the scenarios, "Y would always be better off "creates a confidence feedback loop which generates the necessary minimum threshold level of confidence required to make the move. Hence, our Assumption 1 that the minimum threshold confidence exists is validated
As mentioned, the crux of this solution/mindhack is not the story/narrative. It can be modified if you're able to create a better one. This is just the first story I came up with. People have used it directly. Few have modified it to suit their taste. And interestingly, most of them did not even have to use the story because the sheer thought gave them sufficient confidence to go talk to the other person. The beauty of looking at this problem this way is that you know what to think, what to do and what to say for every "No" that can possibly come from the other side. Point is that the confidence increase has happened naturally.
What happens after the conversation is initiated is outside the scope of analysis of this discussion.
Till now, we've been trying to solve the problem for Y. Let's just quickly look at what are the stances for X before wrapping up this post. In case someone comes to X with this pitch,
1. X is already committed and not interested in the conversation. X can just say "No". Y knows how to handle the "No" with the strategy discussed above. So it is a WIN WIN for both as both parties are acting in their best interest.
2. X is single and not interested. X says No during any point in the conversation. X is happy. Y is happy - Again WIN WIN
3. X is single and interested. X says Yes. Again WIN WIN for both.
Below is a flowchart of the framework discussed.

Saturday, October 2, 2021
Nine to Five
Well. Hello there! Long time. No See. Sorry my bad that I haven't been writing much. Been almost 3 years since my last post. This one's called
" 9 to 5 ".
So, there are 2 reasons why I decided to write again. One - This blog is special to me and I can't see it go dry with no content. Two - I wanted my creative juices to start flowing and writing is the best medium for that goal.
Now that I've decided to write again, next up is deciding what to write about - I have a handful of stories in mind. And decided to write this one since it really changed my perspective about certain things, which will be clear by the end of this story.
This is about an interesting set of events on a random Friday when I was working a sort of 9 to 5 job.
The location for story was Chennai. The year I think was 2013. Been 8 years now. I was working for ITC Ltd. as a manager. I was in charge of setting up a manufacturing facility and the location of my factory was in the outskirts of North Chennai. Just like you or anyone who has worked at 9-5 job, I absolutely loved my job. :D
Well. Yeah... I wouldn't say I was super excited with my job. It was ok, I guess.
Anyway, no point talking about that. Let's jump in right into this one.
This was my first job. And it was to set up a manufacturing facility right in the outskirts of Chennai. For the first 2 years of this project, I was living in this so-called outskirt area - a place called Tiruvottiyur. It was like 30-40 kms north of core Chennai city. But when the project was about to be completed and the next project about to commence, I was asked to move in to the city. So, I took up residence in Vellachery with Jairaj, who's a very close friend from school and Rohit, who was Jairaj's friend. And it was one kickass year chilling like crazy with the two of them.
And no! This story isn't one of those fun #flatmatebonding/doingcrazysh*ttogether bromance story. That's for another day. This is a specific incident that happened during the 1 year I spent at Vellachery.
Although I had moved to Vellachery (VCY), I had to visit Thiruvottiyur(TVT) quite often to close out the first project - Since it was my first professional contribution as part of my work life, I was also quite emotionally attached to the project. I was leading a near 100-member team and I wanted to be present at the project site often myself since I felt my oversight was absolutely necessary.
Usually, ITC used to arrange a car for me to travel all the way from VCY to TVT. But occasionally when the car won't be available, I used to take a local train and travel half way and then take a bus for the remaining part of the journey. This was one of those days. And when I travel, I typically have my backpack + my trademark headphones where I'll be blasting music.






























